How do you use aforementioned in a sentence?

Aforementioned in a Sentence ?

1. Any of the aforementioned applicants will make great company employees.
2. Before any of the aforementioned performers take the stage, the judges will decide which individual will leave the contest tonight.

What does aforementioned case mean?

Something that was mentioned before is aforementioned. Once you’ve written about something, it can then be referred to as aforementioned.

Is it aforementioned or forementioned?

As adjectives the difference between forementioned and aforementioned. is that forementioned is mentioned earlier or above; already cited while aforementioned is previously mentioned.

What is a synonym for aforementioned?

aforementionedadjective. Previously mentioned. Synonyms: aforesaid, mentioned, abovementioned.

Is aforementioned formal?

“Aforementioned” is more formal. More important, both words are old-fashioned and pompous.

Is Aforereferenced a word?

cited or mentioned earlier or previously.

Do people still use aforementioned?

Forementioned and aforementioned have the same meaning; both are acceptable and interchangeable. These words are not commonly used in conversation. Their use is primarily in legal or formal correspondence and documents.

Is forementioned a word?

Mentioned earlier or above; already cited.

What is opposite of aforementioned?

aforementionednoun. Antonyms: following, undermentioned. Synonyms: aforesaid, mentioned, abovementioned.

Is it OK to use aforementioned?

To write clearly and effectively, avoid legal jargon like the word above-mentioned or aforementioned. Instead, use words such as previously, earlier or above.

What is the obverse problem of concurrent delay?

Logic dictates that only one of these competing claims can succeed. This is sometimes referred to as the ‘obverse problem’. The approach in the Malmaison case avoids this problem in cases of concurrent delay in the sense that the contractor is entitled to time, but not money.

How is concurrent delay avoided in the Malmaison case?

The approach in the Malmaison case avoids this problem in cases of concurrent delay in the sense that the contractor is entitled to time, but not money. Apportionment, by its nature, defies the ‘logic’ of the obverse problem by allowing both claims to succeed, at least in part.

Do you need a rare disease assumption in a case control study?

Thus, the ‘rare disease assumption’ is not needed for the large majority of published case–control studies. In addition, different assumptions are needed for case–control studies in dynamic populations and those in cohorts to ensure that the odds ratios are estimates of ratios of incidence rates.

Is the theory of case control studies still valid?

These notions are no longer compatible with present-day epidemiological theory of case–control studies which is based on ‘density sampling’.